Another season of Game of Thrones is in the books, which means that this blog will go back to discussing grammar—this time with Valyrian added to the usual Dothraki posts (though I will mention that the Dothraki posts have not disappeared. There’s more there yet!).
This week I wanted to talk a little bit more about verbs. I spent a lot of time on the verb conjugation paradigm, and am reasonably pleased with how it came out. We’ve already gotten a look at the present indicative tense, so let’s jump to the past. There are two main tenses that occur primarily in the past: the perfect and the imperfect. Each tense has a stem modification in addition to personal endings, but the stem modification for the imperfect is predictable. The perfect displays patterns of predictability, but is not 100% predictable based on the shape of the root.
To start with, let’s look at the imperfect. The imperfect tense is used primarily to set up action in the past. It focuses on a specific action in the past that is viewed internally (i.e. is viewed as not yet having been completed). In a sentence like “He was talking to some lady when her dragon lit him on fire”, the verb “was talking” would be in the imperfect in High Valyrian. The imperfect tense is associated with the -il suffix (by the way, pay careful attention to my use of the word “suffix” there. I’ve seen “infix” thrown around, but such an analysis is inaccurate) plus the e set of personal endings. Here’s what the imperfect looks like with a consonant-final stem. Below I’ll use the verb pāsagon, which means “to trust” or “to believe”.
| Person/Type | Imperfect Active Tense | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indicative | Subjunctive | |||
| Singular | Plural | Singular | Plural | |
| First Person | pāsilen | pāsilin | pāsilon | pāsiloty |
| Second Person | pāsilē | pāsilēt | pāsilō | pāsilōt |
| Third Person | pāsiles | pāsilis | pāsilos | pāsilosy |
| Imperative | ||||
| Infinitive | ||||
| Participle | ||||
The imperfect has no associated participle, and no stand-alone infinitive or imperative.
When a verb stem with a final vowel is put into the imperfect, the vowel of the suffix -il coalesces with the vowel of the stem to produce a long vowel. As our example, I’ll use the verb bardugon, which means “to write” (coined in honor of Leigh Bardugo, author of Siege and Storm, which just came out [plug!]. You may remember her from such Dothraki words as lei).
| Person/Type | Imperfect Active Tense | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indicative | Subjunctive | |||
| Singular | Plural | Singular | Plural | |
| First Person | bardīlen | bardīlin | bardīlon | bardīloty |
| Second Person | bardīlē | bardīlēt | bardīlō | bardīlōt |
| Third Person | bardīles | bardīlis | bardīlos | bardīlosy |
| Imperative | ||||
| Infinitive | ||||
| Participle | ||||
As you can see, the tense isn’t that difficult to get a handle on. The only wrinkle is figuring out whether a stem is consonant- or vowel-final, and then what the result is if the stem is vowel-final. Here’s a summary (using the first person singular active indicative as an example):
- pās-agon “to trust” → pāsilen
- bardu-gon “to write” → bardīlen
- keli-gon “to stop” → kelīlen
- mije-gon “to lack” → mijīlen
- nekto-gon “to cut” → nektēlen
- penda-gon “to wonder” → pendēlen
The above should be fairly intuitive. Moving on to the next tense, the perfect probably enjoys much greater use than the imperfect. The perfect tense focuses on an act that has been completed. By definition this action will have occurred in the past, but it can often be used with present relevance (what is often called an anterior). In English you can actually use the simple past in just this way. For example, if someone offers you food but you’re full, you can say, “I’ve eaten”. This is the English perfect, and it’s fairly standard. You could also say, “I ate”—even better if you add “already”. Think of the High Valyrian perfect as both of those uses rolled into one, but without needing the word “already”. Using our example above, the verb “lit” would be in the perfect in High Valyrian.
In the perfect, it’s not enough to simply know whether the stem ends with a consonant or vowel to figure out what the perfect will look like. Most of the time it has a -t or -et suffix, but this isn’t always (or exclusively) the case. Here’s what our two example verbs look like in the perfect. First, pāsagon.
| Person/Type | Perfect Active Tense | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indicative | Subjunctive | |||
| Singular | Plural | Singular | Plural | |
| First Person | pāstan | pāsti | pāston | pāstoty |
| Second Person | pāstā | pāstāt | pāstō | pāstōt |
| Third Person | pāstas | pāstis | pāstos | pāstosy |
| Imperative | ||||
| Infinitive | pāstagon | |||
| Participle | ||||
What a tasty verb… And now bardugon.
| Person/Type | Perfect Active Tense | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indicative | Subjunctive | |||
| Singular | Plural | Singular | Plural | |
| First Person | bardutan | barduti | barduton | bardutoty |
| Second Person | bardutā | bardutāt | bardutō | bardutōt |
| Third Person | bardutas | bardutis | bardutos | bardutosy |
| Imperative | ||||
| Infinitive | bardutagon | |||
| Participle | ||||
Again, the endings are fairly simple (the same as the present tense endings), it’s just figuring out the stem. Here are some examples of perfect stems (again using the first person singular) and their associated infinitives:
- gaom-agon “to do” → gōntan
- henuj-agon “to exit” → hembistan
- māzi-gon “to come” → mastan
- pikīb-agon “to read” → pikīptan
- pygh-agon “to jump” → pȳdan
- qanem-agon “to sharpen” → qanēdan
- rāpūlj-agon “to soften” → rāpūltan
- rij-agon “to praise” → riddan
- rȳb-agon “to hear” → ryptan
- sik-agon “to bear” → sittan
- tat-agon “to finish” → tetan
- urne-gon “to see” → ūndan
- verd-agon “to arrange” → vēttan
A lot of the major patterns are contained in that list along with a couple of the more bizarre ones.
At this point, I think it’s more than possible to put a few sentences together. I’ll see what else I have time to put out in the coming months. Until next time, geros ilas!



